| Solid Thunder aka Brent-men | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
lordsavage
Posts : 35 Join date : 2010-01-18
| Subject: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 5/16/2010, 6:07 pm | |
| Monster: 22 3x Battery Micro Cell 2x Battery AA 2x Battery D 2x Wattpheasant 2x Wattfox 2x Battery Industrial 3x Wat Giraffe 2x Calculator 3x Thunder King
Spells: 10 3x Solidarity 2x Wattcube 1x Cold Wave 1x MST 1x Trunade 1x Card Destruction 1x Vortex
Traps: 9 2x Compulsory 2x Bottomless 2x Rivalry 1x Dust Tornado 2x Threat Roar
40 cards of pure shocking power...pun totally intended
Typical Extra deck, but with 1 or 2 copies of Wattchimera
Let me know what you think
Last edited by lordsavage on 8/9/2010, 6:45 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : changed deck list) | |
|
| |
urahara
Posts : 82 Join date : 2010-01-16
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 5/26/2010, 6:43 pm | |
| i like this deck alot. for some reason i like solid simple decks. anywho i think the AA should be and add 1 of each of the industrial strength, charger, and a fuel cell. also maybe take out something for a 3rd D. one more card i would like to see at 3 is the short curcuit, other than that i like the build as of thus far | |
|
| |
lordsavage
Posts : 35 Join date : 2010-01-18
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 5/26/2010, 8:42 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
fusilier Admin
Posts : 120 Join date : 2010-01-13
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 5/27/2010, 10:07 am | |
| Short Circuit is not all that good. It doesn't play off as consistently and as fast as the Croaking you are thinking of. I actually think that dropping Circuit in favor of something more consistent is a great idea | |
|
| |
urahara
Posts : 82 Join date : 2010-01-16
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 5/27/2010, 12:26 pm | |
| i guesss your right about the consistancy of croaking vs curcuit. but i believe the AA's should be one of each of industrial strength, charger, and a fuel cell | |
|
| |
fusilier Admin
Posts : 120 Join date : 2010-01-13
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 5/28/2010, 9:03 am | |
| maybe, that should be tested at the very least, but I don't have alot of faith in it.
Since Micro-Cell is limited in what it can grab (D and AA are really it) dropping targets for it is not that great of an idea. I think that 5 is the prime number (ha) and since AA is better in trip than in dupe the 2 D, 3 AA line-up makes the most sense.
But that is only number theory... | |
|
| |
urahara
Posts : 82 Join date : 2010-01-16
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 6/1/2010, 1:29 pm | |
| but don't forget that micro cell can grab itself. and i only mention that because if you choose it as a target for itself then you can draw another card so it is replacing itself if they attack it, also if they attack it it is giving you another batteryman in the grave. and if they don't attack it then they leave you with a monster on the field to sack for charger which will replace the micro cell unless they negate the summon. when you sac teh cell you still have a 2nd thunder in your grave to remove for industrial, secondly if you have industrial or fuel cell you have threshhold for curcuit all just because they didn't want to give you the draw for the second cell. (i can explain my choices better in person) | |
|
| |
fusilier Admin
Posts : 120 Join date : 2010-01-13
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 6/1/2010, 10:21 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
urahara
Posts : 82 Join date : 2010-01-16
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 6/1/2010, 11:08 pm | |
| my bad i misread its effect. well ok i still think one of each industrial,charger, and fuel cell should be added | |
|
| |
lordsavage
Posts : 35 Join date : 2010-01-18
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men 8/9/2010, 6:46 pm | |
| updated the decklist
now using Fox, Pheasant, and Cube | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Solid Thunder aka Brent-men | |
| |
|
| |
| Solid Thunder aka Brent-men | |
|